QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 13 2017, 08:03 AM)
![*](style_images/NWN/post_snapback.gif)
According to the NWN, it would seem the possibility of a claw-back of the grant for the control tower is conditional! It might not come as much of a surprise to see Julian Swift-Hook citing 'legal professional privilege' as the reason why the meeting to discuss the apparent discrepancy in the wording of the council's press release and SIB's letter was made private.
Can you give the background to this AC, I haven't seen the NWN. who's threatening to claw back what, and what statements are in disagreement.
I note also from the GPC "consultation" that GPC are claiming to be legally obliged to complete CT, but that looks likely to be untrue and will materially affect how people feel about supporting the completion.
The "consultation" is also phrased to be deliberately misleading by giving the impression that Greenham precept payers won't be paying for the project, and they certainly are.