IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

25 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Hosepipe ban
Darren
post Apr 9 2012, 02:56 PM
Post #121


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 15-May 09
Member No.: 61



QUOTE (Exhausted @ Apr 9 2012, 03:25 PM) *
I guess it was to be expected and I'm sure that the water vigilantes will come out in force rioting and smashing up greenhouses and making off with the produce..................


laugh.gif

I await the photos in the People showing masked looters making off with tomato plants and an armful of cucumbers..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Apr 9 2012, 03:03 PM
Post #122


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



QUOTE (jaycakes @ Apr 9 2012, 03:19 PM) *
There's a woman who lives here too and she leaves hair all over the bath.

Do you collect them? You could make a pillow blink.gif blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brewmaster
post Apr 9 2012, 05:19 PM
Post #123


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 17-July 09
Member No.: 201



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 9 2012, 12:07 PM) *
You didn't previously say that you would 'use' the water first.

Read my post - no. 99 - again. I said 'Using a hosepipe to syphon water out of a domestic bath is surely OK'. Surely that assumes that it has been used it to bath in.

Or are you suggesting that I would fill the bath from the tap just so that I could syphon the water out onto the garden by hosepipe?

Hey, that's an idea!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nothing Much
post Apr 9 2012, 06:37 PM
Post #124


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,690
Joined: 16-July 11
Member No.: 6,171



Keep going Brewmaster 3 shirleys in a row will give you endless water credits.
ce
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 9 2012, 06:51 PM
Post #125


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Brewmaster @ Apr 9 2012, 06:19 PM) *
Read my post - no. 99 - again. I said 'Using a hosepipe to syphon water out of a domestic bath is surely OK'. Surely that assumes that it has been used it to bath in. Or are you suggesting that I would fill the bath from the tap just so that I could syphon the water out onto the garden by hosepipe? Hey, that's an idea!

Exactly, and that is one reason you might still be in breach of a hosepipe ban.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Apr 9 2012, 07:41 PM
Post #126


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (Exhausted @ Apr 9 2012, 03:25 PM) *
I just hope that if the reporters started the Benyon Watergate they get screwed to the ground. I know the newspapers need to sell their papers but this really is scraping the barrel. Do we really believe that the Englefield estate would leave a hose running even when there are no water restrictions. People who work in that environment are professionals either estate or house servants unless one of them had a grudge and turned on the hose and then for a couple of bob rang the People.
Anyway, as the house has a borehole and probably treats its own waste water it really is academic.
I guess it was to be expected and I'm sure that the water vigilantes will come out in force rioting and smashing up greenhouses and making off with the produce..................

Yes. I don't know if I believe this particular story, but the way all MP's seem to put themselves on a pedestal these days, nothing would surprise me about them feeling they (and their minions) are exempt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_jaycakes_*
post Apr 10 2012, 12:05 AM
Post #127





Guests






Well after a night of driving around my car is dirtier than a hotel in a back street in the middle east and my wheels are especially caked.
Depending on what time I wake up I will try to wash with a bucket. Oh the joys. Luckily I bought from a car show a silly little pump-pressure sprayer which I can use to help rinse off suds afterwards but it's still an awful lot of trouble.

The joke is the bloody polish people up the road can use it to charge people £3.00 for a car wash. I would just get them to do mine but a) I've never paid for someone else to wash my car and cool.gif they would remove all my wax and polish and no doubt leave a whole load of swirl marks and I'd need to machine polish the motor again.

Am I right in thinking if you are say a part time car detailer (eg you do it at the weekends for people who pay you money) you can use their water supply if you are charging them in a business nature?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Berkshirelad
post Apr 11 2012, 12:48 PM
Post #128


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 13-August 09
Member No.: 271



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 9 2012, 06:51 PM) *
Exactly, and that is one reason you might still be in breach of a hosepipe ban.


I don't think so. Once the water has been run into the bath - whether used for bathing or not - it is no longer regarded as potable water. It becomes - by virtue of having left the mains - 'grey water'.

This is the reason that your kitchen's cold tap should come directly off the main supply and not from the cold water tank in the attic.

Similarly, in theory, you could water your garden with a hose from the hot tap...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nothing Much
post Apr 11 2012, 12:59 PM
Post #129


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,690
Joined: 16-July 11
Member No.: 6,171



No wonder MPs fudged their expenses. There is so much grey out there
No wonder David Ike makes a living talking about Lizards.
ce
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vodabury
post Apr 12 2012, 06:46 PM
Post #130


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 15-July 11
Member No.: 6,124



QUOTE (Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera @ Apr 9 2012, 11:46 AM) *
Has Richard Benyon MP & the Minister for Water had a 'Clinton! moment when he stated "Neither I, nor my family, nor anyone who works for me turned that hose on”?

I think the "Clinton moment" may soon be for the journalist. An anti-Tory showbiz hack who decided to call in on a bank holiday to discuss the hosepipe ban?

Maybe Ladbrokes are conducting their own investigation into betting patterns on this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 12 2012, 06:56 PM
Post #131


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



I wonder if us 'mere mortals' would be treated the same if one of our 'friends' or neighbours decided to play a 'prank' on us and turn the tap on of a connected hose pipe? I suggest then that all hose pipes should be packet out of harms way; they are not necessary at the moment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vodabury
post Apr 12 2012, 07:13 PM
Post #132


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 15-July 11
Member No.: 6,124



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 12 2012, 07:56 PM) *
I wonder if us 'mere mortals' would be treated the same if one of our 'friends' or neighbours decided to play a 'prank' on us and turn the tap on of a connected hose pipe? I suggest then that all hose pipes should be packet out of harms way; they are not necessary at the moment.

Exactly. The story could not have been about wasting water, for the "journalist" (by his own admission) stood by and watched the hose run for two hours. Did he not think to turn off the tap?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 12 2012, 08:29 PM
Post #133


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Vodabury @ Apr 12 2012, 08:13 PM) *
Exactly. The story could not have been about wasting water, for the "journalist" (by his own admission) stood by and watched the hose run for two hours. Did he not think to turn off the tap?

It would seem it wasn't about wasting water as such, more the potentially illegal use of it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vodabury
post Apr 12 2012, 08:43 PM
Post #134


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 15-July 11
Member No.: 6,124



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 12 2012, 09:29 PM) *
It would seem it wasn't about wasting water as such, more the potentially illegal use of it.

But as the estate has its own borehole there was no illegal use. And Thames Water have confirmed this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 12 2012, 08:50 PM
Post #135


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Vodabury @ Apr 12 2012, 09:43 PM) *
But as the estate has its own borehole there was no illegal use. And Thames Water have confirmed this.

That is why I used the word potentially. It does raise the question why they tuned it off if they were not doing anything wrong?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nothing Much
post Apr 12 2012, 10:53 PM
Post #136


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,690
Joined: 16-July 11
Member No.: 6,171



tuned it off ?
Audio is a darn dodgy business.
ce
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vodabury
post Apr 13 2012, 08:11 AM
Post #137


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 15-July 11
Member No.: 6,124



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 12 2012, 09:50 PM) *
It does raise the question why they tuned it off if they were not doing anything wrong?

I should imagine the Benyon household turned it off for the same reason they didn't turn it on in the first place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 13 2012, 10:07 AM
Post #138


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Vodabury @ Apr 13 2012, 09:11 AM) *
I should imagine the Benyon household turned it off for the same reason they didn't turn it on in the first place.

Assuming they did originally turn it off of course; we know what your Tory chums can be like! tongue.gif

If a reporter said to me that the pipe was on (and the source was from a bore hole), I'd have replied with a: 'So what, it is from a bore-hole, now get of my land or I'll release the hounds on you peasant journalist you!" tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Apr 13 2012, 10:39 AM
Post #139


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Vodabury @ Apr 12 2012, 09:43 PM) *
But as the estate has its own borehole there was no illegal use. And Thames Water have confirmed this.

I don't understand the reasoning here. Surely taking water from an aquifer means someone somewhere else can't have it, especially if it's depleted.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Apr 13 2012, 11:01 AM
Post #140


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (JeffG @ Apr 13 2012, 11:39 AM) *
Surely taking water from an aquifer means someone somewhere else can't have it, especially if it's depleted.

It depends, but probably not. Aquifers are really big, like many tens of miles across, but the water in them is not terribly mobile, so drawing down the water table in one location doesn't greatly influence the water table in other locations (though it depends on what kind of ground it is) unless you're creating a really big gradient by pumping out millions of gallons. Mostly the ground water is just moving down the water table gradient until it emerges in a stream, and that journey can take many years (I know rivers rise when it rains, but that actual water might have fallen ten years ago and was effectively squeezed out of the aquifer by the weight of the rain joining the queue in the uplands) so to some degree if you don't use the ground water it isn't saved for someone else to use, it just flows out to sea.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

25 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 04:52 AM