Nicely played Theresa, nicely played.

Oh dear. If it’s a trap, JC will walk. He isn’t stupid and I reckon he’ll be believed.

Oh dear. If it’s a trap, JC will walk. He isn’t stupid and I reckon he’ll be believed.

He's lost a lot of grass roots support, his generation X support is withering and all he wants now is a term as pm. If he can be handled the right way he can be shown to be a bumbling Marxist who wouldn't play ball to save the country. Yeah, he is that stupid. Give a Marxist enough rope and all that. Never know he might get miss Dianne to do the sums on it.

We’ll see.

I find it hilarious that you and your ilk constantly berate and belittle the 'baby boomer' generation yet get all squirmy and moist at the thought of having a seventy year old in number ten.

We’ll see.

I find it hilarious that you and your ilk constantly berate and belittle the 'baby boomer' generation yet get all squirmy and moist at the thought of having a seventy year old in number ten.

Dear God, just please make it stop.......................!

Dear God, just please make it stop.......................!

I'm with Derek, I would rather put my hand in a liquidiser and give the on / off switch to newres than put up with anymore of this nonsense. Seriously, ******* stay or go, I'm past caring, just do something, anything!

That's been the plan all along. Make the Brexiteers give up. Bit stupid really as this will come back to haunt them. The repercussions will be huge...

I'm with Derek, I would rather put my hand in a liquidiser and give the on / off switch to newres than put up with anymore of this nonsense. Seriously, ******* stay or go, I'm past caring, just do something, anything!

I guess you believe that religion should be banned then.🤣

Wholly agree but how dare you imply comments I've made are not true. What proof do you or anyone else need? Signed affidavits, entries from Hansard, published papers or what? Past experience here demonstrates that even if paths are provided, certain posters with closed minds still won't open. If we take the Irish border question, then that is actually dealt with in a technical paper created by the EU dealing with potential consequences of the UKs exit - go find. The very nature of politics means that there will be often wildly different interpretations of what appear at first sight to be clear and correct information - which time and again is proved unclear and incorrect. Most people are also beginning to realise that the web or Google is not the sole or indeed an infallible source. So for me, political debate is only possible with people who are able to respond with a reasoned grounded reply and not simply insults when their own views are challenged. I can only conclude that isn't likely to happen here.

I haven't been particularly specific so if you feel that it applies to you then that's your issue. If you can't prove something or at least point us in the direction of where the information is, then why would anyone believe you? It's as good as the old "a bloke down the pub told me" opener to all sorts of nonsense and urban myths that we don't have anymore.

Such as?

I think that one argument is that the public will lose faith in democracy and there will be rioting in the streets etc. I don't really buy it myself because people often vote for political parties on the basis of what is in their manifesto and often these promises are either broken, watered down or delayed. Granted, this is a bit more high profile than most of those promises and the vote for it was a bit more direct than usual but most people are fairly used to being lied to and generally let down by politicians.